Healthcare & employee benefits / Published research study
The Cancer Attention Gap
A study of the gap between employers' belief in early cancer expertise and how cancer-related benefit decisions are made.
HR and benefits leaders

THE RESEARCH QUESTION
Where does employer attention to cancer benefits fall short of the value leaders see in specialist expertise?
A study of the gap between employers' belief in early cancer expertise and how cancer-related benefit decisions are made.
Selected published findings
- 94% of surveyed leaders believed early expert intervention improves outcomes and reduces costs.
- 6% reported using external oncology specialists for high-cost cancer decisions.
How the study was conducted
Published by AccessHope and Lantern. The public landing page identifies HR and benefits leaders as the audience; consult the full study for its sample and detailed methods.
The findings concern leaders' views and reported practices, not a clinical trial or proof of patient outcomes. No unverified sample size is supplied here.
What makes this Data as Marketing
A clear, research-backed benefits conversation that helps a healthcare brand make an important issue visible to its buyers.
This is an example of research becoming a public marketing asset, not a claim of measured revenue or lead-generation lift.
How Gather turns research into marketing ↗MORE ORIGINAL WORK
Different markets.
Real buyer evidence.

Cover Genius · Insurance & fintech
The Protection Gap
1,392 consumers across seven countries
Explore the research
CloudBolt · Cloud infrastructure
The Mass VMware Exodus That Never Was
302 IT decision-makers
Explore the researchEnvoy · Aerospace & defense
The 2026 Aerospace & Defense Compliance Gap
140 aerospace and defense leaders
Explore the research